The Supports and Barriers to Facilities at the University of Mauritius
- Exclusion
Who does this case study involve?
Students at the University of Mauritius
The case
Students with disabilities typically have a much lower retention rate in universities, and the principal reason for this is that the university staff (in all departments) are inadvertently designing institutional and educational barriers that are challenging for all students, but are compounded for students with disabilities. In the context of institutional barriers that the students encounter, these can include things such as: having buildings or rooms that are inaccessible to people with mobility issues; lacking specialist software for students with sight and dyslexic disabilities; and not creating support group structures for students with disabilities. In the context of the educational experience that the students encounter, these educational barriers are created when educators are doing things such as: developing poorly organized educational materials and learning environments; producing multimedia that is uncaptioned or doesn’t have subtitles; creating educational materials that cannot be read by a screen reader or accessed without a mouse.
The University of Mauritius wanted to find out some of the sources of exclusion that exist within their institution (both at an institutional level and at an educational level), and they did so by developing an online, self-administered survey that asked students two key questions:
- Which facilities have insufficient support for students with disabilities?
- Are the students aware of the existing supporting facilities that are currently provided?
To explore this issue, the university sent this survey to 500 students (which is 4% of the overall student population), and they obtained 122 responses (which is a 24.4% response rate).
Findings
References
Singh, U., Pudaruth, S. and Gunputh, R. (2017) “Forgotten, excluded or included? Students with disabilities: A case study at the University of Mauritius”. African Journal of Disability, 6(1), pp.1-12.
